Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nokia Corp. (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scratchmyback who wrote (4761)	4/12/2007 6:47:48 AM
From: JeffreyHF	Respond to of 9255

Scratchy, litigation involving patents and trade secrets routinely involve certain sensitive documents and/or testimony being utilized pursuant to a "Protective Order". While discoverable and capable of being offered into evidence (if otherwise admissible), they are stamped "Confidential", and can only be disclosed to the parties, their attorneys and experts/consultants, the Court, and the trier of fact (judge and/or jury),and must not otherwise be made public. All copies must be returned to the owner at the conclusion of the specific case. All involved in the process are bound by the order, and sworn to not disclose the contents of the covered documents and/or testimony.

To: scratchmyback who wrote (4761)	4/12/2007 4:13:21 PM
From: Grad B	Respond to of 9255

I believe that the objective of any Nokia press releases on this issue is to bring pressure upon Qualcomm. So what is Nokia trying to heat up? Surely, Nokia and Qualcomm know the terms of their expired agreement. So who is Nokia talking to? NOK shareholders? QCOM shareholders? Courts? EU? other QCOM licensees? But of course, according to the many agitated QCOM investors, Nokia's press release is just a stupid move by a desperate company who has played right into the Q's hand. (I'm not quite sure why they are so agitated, if this were the case.)