SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: geode00 who wrote (1962)4/12/2007 11:09:37 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Why Imus Had to Go
___________________________________________________________

By Eugene Robinson
Columnist
The Washington Post
Friday, April 13, 2007

Now that the networks have pulled the plug on Don Imus, let's have no hyperventilation to the effect that the aging shock jock's fall from undeserved grace raises some important question about just who in our society is permitted to say just what. Wherever "the line" delineating acceptable discourse might be, calling those young women from Rutgers University "nappy-headed hos" is miles on the other side.

Especially for a 67-year-old white man with a long history of racist, sexist and homophobic remarks.

For young black hip-hop artists to use such language to demean black women is similarly deplorable -- and, I would argue, even more damaging. But come on, people, don't deceive yourselves that it's precisely the same thing. Don't pretend that 388 years of history -- since the first shackled African slaves arrived at Jamestown -- never happened. The First Amendment notwithstanding, it has always been the case that some speech has been off-limits to some people. I remember a time when black people couldn't say "I'd like to vote, please." Now, white people can't say "nappy-headed hos." You'll survive.

While we're at the business of blunt truth, do the big-time media luminaries who so often graced Imus's show have some explaining to do? You bet, and so do the parent news organizations, including my own, that allowed their journalists to go on a broadcast that routinely crossed the aforementioned line. All these trained observers couldn't have failed to notice Imus's well-practiced modus operandi. "He never said anything bad while I was on" doesn't cut it as a defense.

Nor is there much exculpatory power in Imus's defense of himself, which can be paraphrased as "I'm not a racist, I just keep saying racist things." What characteristics, do you suppose, could possibly identify a person who was indeed a racist? You think maybe that saying racist things might be a fairly reliable clue?

One of the most interesting things about the Imus meltdown is how MSNBC and its parent company, NBC Universal, moved from sluggish inaction to ordering a two-week suspension to bidding Imus, his cowboy hat and his unfunny entourage an abrupt adios. A day later, CBS Radio followed suit and canceled Imus.

The pressure applied by Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and other activists certainly got NBC and CBS's attention, and the news conference held by the offended Rutgers team was devastating. News stories citing Imus's past transgressions were embarrassing. And the withdrawal of Imus's biggest advertisers -- General Motors, GlaxoSmithKline, American Express, Ditech.com, Procter & Gamble, Staples, Sprint Nextel -- removed any financial incentive for MSNBC to keep the show on the air.

It would be logical to conclude that money talked and therefore Imus walked. But I tend to believe NBC News President Steve Capus when he says that the biggest factor was the internal reaction from NBC News employees, who told him in no uncertain terms that enough was enough.

Two of the network's on-air stars -- "Today" weatherman Al Roker and NBC correspondent Ron Allen -- authored strong anti-Imus posts on NBC blogs. Producers of NBC and MSNBC news shows gave the controversy nonstop coverage. Meanwhile, Capus was hearing from dozens of NBC employees who worried about what continued association with Imus would do to the network's reputation. Among them were women and minorities who told Capus they felt the sting of Imus's attacks personally.

Which is a sign of how the world has changed.

Four decades ago, when Imus started his long and lucrative radio career, there were few women and minorities at NBC in a position to influence the company's decision on an issue like this one. Take it another step: There were few women and minorities in positions of authority at the firms that advertised on Imus's show.

In think tanks and on college campuses, intellectuals still argue about diversity, but in corporate America the issue is settled: Diversity is a fact of today's world. In the nation's two most populous states, California and Texas, minorities already form a majority. Companies realize they cannot survive, let alone thrive, without courting diversity among their employees and their customers. You certainly can't run a television network these days without taking diversity into account.

Imus's advertisers couldn't afford to be associated with racist, misogynistic views, and neither could NBC. This doesn't portend any sort of chilling effect on free speech, as some have suggested. It doesn't mean that white males are being relegated to the dustbin of history. Last time I checked, guys, you still ran most of the world. You just have to be a bit nicer these days, and you have to share.



To: geode00 who wrote (1962)4/12/2007 11:17:11 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Imus dismissal may have profound effect on media
_____________________________________________________________

By Brad Kava
The San Jose Mercury News
04/12/2007

The firing of shock jock Don Imus from his CBS radio show Thursday, and the fact that he was brought down by a media watchdog Web site may have a profound effect on cleaning up radio and television in the future, say media workers and watchers.

Since he called the Rutgers University women's basketball team "nappy-headed hos," just over a week ago, Imus has been caught in a firestorm of public reaction, that included criticism from Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Oprah Winfrey, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson - not to mention Howard Stern who left the public airwaves for the refuge of satellite radio, where he can say anything he wants.

"I think this is the beginning of the end of the shock-jock style," said Trish Robbins, assistant program director at San Francisco's KGO-AM (810), the Bay Area's top-rated talk station. "Maybe radio needs to find a new paradigm. The shock-jock does grab everyone's attention and being nice doesn't grab anyone's attention," she said. "It has to be something in the middle."

On Thursday, Imus raised more than $1 million on the radio for children's charities while at the same time hinting that his career may be over. "I don't know if this will be my last radiothon, my suspicion is it will be," he said before the announcement of his firing was made.

Imus was first suspended from his radio show and his simulcast television show on MSNBC and then fired, Wednesday from TV and a day later from radio.

"In our meetings with concerned groups, there has been much discussion of the effect language like this has on our young people, particularly young women of color trying to make their way in this society," said CBS president Leslie Moonves in a news release.

Sponsors had left the television show in droves, after the Web site Media Matters for America (www.mediamatters.org) publicized Imus's comment, sending it to reporters across the country, and Sharpton and Jackson led protests against the DJ.

"It's momentous that a network has decided to exercise a principle of responsibility over a professional loudmouth," said Todd Gitlin, professor of Journalism and Sociology at Manhattan's Columbia University.

"This may turn the tide of verbal laissez-faire that has prevailed for 20 years."

Moonves, whose network broadcast Imus on 61 stations, said he hoped CBS would learn from the experience.

Radio has gone unbridled since the relaxing of the fairness doctrine in 1987, which required stations to present fair and balanced political viewpoints.

Since then, said Gitlin, radio networks have been governed by "the capacity to collect eardrums without any regard for veracity let alone civility."

But the bows of TV and radio stations have been hit hard by cannon fire the past few years.

The appearance of singer Janet Jackson's nipple during the 2003 Super Bowl halftime show resulted in millions of dollars of fines to CBS, and in Congress making later fines ten times more expensive.

The death earlier this year of a 28-year-old mother during a Sacramento radio station water drinking contest has made program directors more careful in what they do for publicity.

And Imus's three word epithet has been a wake-up call to programmers.

"Being mean to be mean is passe`," said Robbins, who has been at KGO for two decades. "We need to find cutting-edge thinkers who know where the precipice is, and whose routine doesn't involve just flat out insults."

Media Matters, the three-year-old progressive watchdog group, viewed the response as a chance to make even more progress.

It sent out a memo Thursday listing other offensive statements by popular conservative TV and radio hosts, including Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly and Michael Savage.

"A significant group of Americans has spoken out in a fairly significant way," said the group's spokesman Eric Burns. "I think their message is one that most decent folks agree with - bigotry, sexism and anti-Semitism has no place on the public airwaves."

One of Burns's main complaints is with the "mainstreaming of very extremist right-wing personalities" on cable news and radio. When people are expecting serious journalism, they are getting theatrics, name-calling, misinformation and bigotry.

"Media personalities and high-profile journalists have a special role and a special responsibility," said Burns.

On his Thursday radio show, Limbaugh, who has some 20 million listeners, warned that he was now on the hit list of media watchers, and what he calls "the drive-by media."

He cited a report on CNN that he said Wednesday brought up his making fun of Michael J. Fox's Parkinson's disease last November.

"I'm never not in the crosshairs of these people," Limbaugh told his audience Thursday. "I'm not going to grovel or any of that sort of thing. When you've got the truth on your side and you've got 20 million friends that love you and understand the truth, it's power, folks. I appreciate the concern, but relax. Sit tight. It's going to be fun."



To: geode00 who wrote (1962)4/15/2007 6:16:35 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Republicans Are Losing Ground among the Affluent, Too

pewresearch.org



To: geode00 who wrote (1962)4/25/2007 1:53:42 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Obama hits Bush on foreign policies
_____________________________________________________________

By Mike Dorning
Chicago Tribune national correspondent
April 24, 2007

Sen. Barack Obama accused President Bush on Monday of weakening America's global leadership with a "squandered" response to terrorism as the Democratic presidential candidate committed himself to repair relations with allies and the nation's standing around the world.

The Illinois senator pledged to double U.S. foreign aid if elected president, arguing that improvements in stability and living conditions in poor nations would reduce the appeal of terrorism abroad and bolster security at home.

Delivering his presidential campaign's first major address on foreign policy to the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, Obama said the U.S. must resist the temptation to turn to isolationism in response to the losses the nation has suffered in Iraq. And he declared, "The American moment is here.

"America cannot meet the threats of this century alone, but the world cannot meet them without America. We must neither retreat from the world nor try to bully it into submission."

Obama presented the challenges of terrorism, nuclear weapons and global warming as an opportunity to enhance America's influence over the world by emphasizing moral leadership, strengthened alliances and a vigorous U.S. engagement around the globe.

His address provided a withering critique of Bush's handling of the war in Iraq and response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks as "based on old ideologies and outdated strategies." He said the Bush administration's uneasy relations with allies and the scandals over mistreatment of prisoners have done long-term damage to the nation's ability to counter the terrorist threat.

"The president may occupy the White House, but for the last six years the position of leader of the free world has remained open. And it's time to fill that role once more," Obama said.

GOP rejects criticism

Responding to the criticism of Bush, Chris Taylor, a spokesman for the Republican National Committee, said, "Voters want a leader, not someone who continues to throw around criticism and empty rhetoric."

Obama offered a spirited defense of the value of strong ties with foreign allies and international institutions such as the United Nations, arguing they magnify American power more than they constrain it. He also said the U.S. should counter the challenge of Islamist terrorism with a greater emphasis on winning the support of the public in developing nations.

That vision echoes the foreign policy ideas of Democratic presidents who helped shape the U.S. response to the Soviet challenge during the Cold War. Harry Truman constructed an alliance system that included NATO to contain the Soviet Union. The Truman administration's Marshall Plan provided aid to post-World War II Europe to blunt Soviet influence and John Kennedy expanded U.S. aid to the developing world to compete against communist influence there.

Obama added a subtle but clear suggestion that his own life story as the son of an African immigrant who had spent part of his childhood in the developing Islamic nation of Indonesia would give him added credibility as a messenger to the global public.

"It's time we had a president ... who can speak directly to the world, and send a message to all those men and women beyond our shores who long for lives of dignity and security that says 'You matter to us. Your future is our future,'" Obama said.

More soldiers, Marines urged

Still, Obama offered assurance that he would not shrink from using military force to protect the United States. He also called for an expansion of U.S. ground forces, pledging an enlargement of the Army by 60,000 and the Marines by 27,000.

Obama repeated his support for a withdrawal of all U.S. combat troops in Iraq by March 31, 2008, leaving a limited number of American troops there to fight terrorist groups.

He said he would double current foreign aid spending to $50 billion by 2012.

"A relatively small investment in these fragile states up front can be one of the most effective ways to prevent the terror and strife that is far more costly," Obama said.

He called for the U.S. to "lead by example" to combat global warming by capping and reducing greenhouse gas emissions across the economy.

Obama said he would emphasize diplomatic measures and economic sanctions but use military force "if necessary" to stop Iran from producing nuclear weapons and eliminate North Korea's nuclear program.

----------

Copyright © 2007, Chicago Tribune




To: geode00 who wrote (1962)4/27/2007 7:59:04 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
04.19.07 Investigative Reporter Greg Palast talks about Bush stealing the 2008 elections...

stephaniemiller.com



To: geode00 who wrote (1962)5/3/2007 7:43:00 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Ron Paul may make some interesting comments in the GOP debate tonight...he's the one candidate who has very clearly been against the Iraq War...

ronpaul2008.com

ronpaul2008.com

ronpaul2008.com



To: geode00 who wrote (1962)6/4/2007 3:22:50 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317
 
Brad DeLong: Obama Can Remedy Ailing Healthcare System

economistsview.typepad.com



To: geode00 who wrote (1962)8/2/2007 2:43:23 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 149317
 
Edwards: “Giuliani is Bush on Steroids”

rollingstone.com