Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unclewest who wrote (202394)	4/13/2007 6:57:54 AM
From: Ish	Respond to of 793795

<< do not think the killer for Imus was using the phrase "nappy headed". It was - 1. His naming those young gals "hos".>> His thought process should have been would I call them "hos" without the "nappy headed" lead in.

To: unclewest who wrote (202394)	4/13/2007 7:33:12 AM
From: unclewest	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793795

When challenged, XXXXXX became arrogant and stupid. He issued a weak and unacceptable apology. XXXXXX needed to acknowledge and be sorry for the hurtful insult and the bruises his words inflicted, not merely the fact that he said those words. The same reasoning applies to -- xxxxxx = Nifong Nifong will likely and deservedly suffer the same fate as Imus.

To: unclewest who wrote (202394)	4/13/2007 8:56:52 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793795

Nope, blood was in the water. Sharks are incapable of backing off once committed to a feed. [changing metaphores here] Sharpton had his heart set on counting another coup. Then requested their forgiveness, He might have survived.