SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (1965)4/13/2007 10:05:24 AM
From: ChinuSFO  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 149317
 
Glenn,, are you saying that like FOX, Imus was not "Fair and Balanced"!!!!!



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (1965)4/13/2007 6:08:23 PM
From: MJ  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 149317
 
Our President represents all people in America and never snubs anyone.

Ms Hilary has demonstrated with her remark that "I have never had the desire to appear" an elitism unbecoming of a President.

Those Tennessee boys and middle aged men will not forget when they go to the voting booth.

"Not all high-level Democrats were drawn to the self-styled "I-Man." Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), a party presidential front-runner and a frequent target of Imus' jokes, said she never had the desire to appear.

Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), the other current front-runner, appeared once — but he was the first presidential candidate to call this week for Imus' ouster."

As I have already written I think Obama made a very stategic error in calling for Imus's firing. It will be fascinating to see how he handles this in the future.

mj



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (1965)4/15/2007 4:25:18 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Obama taps two worlds for funding
______________________________________________________________

Individuals, political insiders open wallets to fund senator's campaign

By Matthew Mosk and John Solomon
The Washington Post
April 15, 2007

Sen. Barack Obama's elite inner circle of presidential-campaign fundraisers filed into the basement ballroom of a Washington hotel last week to hear the candidate describe "the yearning that America has for change" and his strategy for "tapping into it."

A senator for only two years, the Illinois Democrat has been cast in the early stages of the campaign as an upstart who refused money from Washington lobbyists and parlayed Internet savvy, opposition to the Iraq war and grass-roots enthusiasm into a surprising $25 million first quarter of fundraising -- money that has made him a legitimate contender for the party's nomination.

Behind the closed doors of last week's strategy session, though, was another side to Obama's fundraising success. Filling the room were many veterans of the Democratic financial establishment: a Hyatt hotel heiress, a New York hedge fund manager, a Hollywood movie mogul and a Chicago billionaire.

Obama stood at the front of the room fielding questions for nearly an hour from his national finance team, each of whom has pledged to raise at least $250,000. He shared secret plans for a series of soon-to-be-released policy statements and urged them to call him personally to "tell me how to communicate talking points to you to make you more effective."

'Easiest fundraising phone call'
As the first-quarter finance report his campaign will file today is expected to document, Obama has managed to successfully bridge two very different political worlds. Along with thousands of first-time donors who sent $50 or $100 from their home computers, the report is to list scores of longtime political insiders who funneled stacks of $2,300 checks to Obama's accounts.

The campaign announced earlier this month that Obama has received money from more than 100,000 people, including 50,000 Internet donors -- more online donors than his chief Democratic rival, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), had total donors. Less well-known is the story of how he built a more traditional fundraising machine fueled, in part, by some of the biggest names in Democratic politics.

"It is the single easiest fundraising phone call that I have ever made, ever," said Jeffrey Katzenberg, the Hollywood producer, who set out to raise half a million dollars for Obama and raised more than $1.7 million. "In 25 years. Literally. For charity, politics, anything. It kind of blew me away; if I made 100 phone calls, 90 of them were successes."

In contrast to Clinton and former North Carolina senator John Edwards, his other main Democratic rival, Obama was a late entrant in the presidential race, first raising the idea publicly last October and not deciding firmly until January.

In his 2004 Senate campaign, Obama relied in part on the muscular financial team of Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley, as well as the national donors he picked up after his well-received speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. With nothing like the national networks of Edwards and Clinton, Obama finance officials said they expected it to take time to woo and sign up establishment fundraisers -- many of whom had long-standing ties to Clinton and her husband, President Bill Clinton.

They also knew it would take effort to grow a direct-mail fundraising base to keep a regular flow of small donations coming in.

Penny Pritzker, the Hyatt heiress, helped raise money for Obama's Senate campaign, and he enlisted her as national finance chairwoman for the presidential race. "Candidly, I'd never done this before; I didn't know what to expect," she said.

Fundraisers in the field also worried that Obama's initial pledge to reject money from lobbyists would slow the early hunt for donations.

"One of the quickest sources of cash was off the table, and there was some early grumbling," said one campaign adviser, who was not authorized to talk to reporters and spoke on the condition of anonymity.

The original goal for the first quarter, back in December, was cautiously set at $8 million to $10 million.

The Pritzker family name brought instant fundraising cachet to the presidential campaign as well as the support of many of Chicago's best rank-and-file fundraisers, such as Paula Crown of the Henry Crown family. The Crowns are worth an estimated $4.1 billion and hold stakes in the Chicago Bulls and the New York Yankees, Hilton Hotels, and Rockefeller Center.

Over the Christmas holidays and into early January, Obama made several personal appeals and lured big-name fundraisers in such donor-rich settings as Hollywood and Wall Street. Big-dollar events began coming together quickly.

Obama scored early headlines by snagging Hollywood record mogul David Geffen, one of the Democratic Party's biggest donors and fundraisers during the Clinton era, who publicly defected and hosted a $1 million fundraiser in Hollywood with Katzenberg and director Steven Spielberg, anchors of the Clintons' Hollywood fundraising dream team in the 1990s.

Luring the big guns
Black fundraisers also responded to Obama's call, tapping into new sources of Democratic cash in black communities. "You actually have someone now who looks like he can reach out to a wide and diverse group," said Lorenzo M. Bellamy, an African American from Annapolis who is raising money for Obama.

"He has a way of allowing you to feel as though you are a critical part of the operation," said Orlan Johnson, a Washington lawyer and law professor at Howard University who hosted a fundraiser at Union Station last week that raised more than $400,000.

The initial enthusiasm about Obama pushed his first-quarter goal up to $15 million early in the year, and by March it had shifted again to more than $20 million. Although his final numbers for the quarter exceeded expectations, Clinton still finished first in the fundraising race with $26 million, the bulk of which came from longtime party loyalists. Clinton's husband, renowned for his persuasive skills, has not yet become fully engaged.

Still, Obama has lured many establishment donors and fundraisers from the former president's team. Both of the Clinton Federal Communications Commission chairmen -- Reed Hundt and William E. Kennard -- have jumped to Obama, bringing instant credibility and lengthy Rolodexes in the wealthy telecommunications and Internet industries they once oversaw.

Boston philanthropist Alan Solomont and hedge fund executive Orin Kramer, two anchors of the Clinton money machine dating to 1992, also joined Obama, as did two prominent Clinton supporters' sons, James P. Rubin and Kirk Dornbush.

Rubin, a private equity investor, is the son of former Clinton Treasury secretary Robert E. Rubin, a key architect of Bill Clinton's Wall Street fundraising machine and now an adviser to Hillary Clinton.

Dornbush, an Atlanta businessman and the son of Clinton's ambassador to the Netherlands, K. Terry Dornbush, is anchoring Obama's fundraising in the South. Kirk Dornbush has raised money for Southern Democrats such as Edwards and former Virginia governor Mark R. Warner and planned to sit out the Democratic primaries after Warner dropped from the race.

But after an overture from the Obama campaign that included a copy of one of the senator's books, Dornbush said he thought Obama "had a genuine heartfelt respect for people whose opinions might be different."

After half an hour with Obama in Washington, Dornbush enlisted in the campaign.

'He won't be beholden'
From the outset, Obama tried to establish a "Washington outsider" image -- moving his campaign operations to Chicago and making a bold promise to refuse checks written or gathered by registered federal lobbyists.

The campaign received $50,566 from 49 lobbyists, but aides flagged the checks during initial screening and said they will return the money. Still, for hosting events and otherwise raising money, the Obama fundraising team is relying on partners in lobbying firms who are not registered for specific clients, former lobbyists who recently dropped clients and spouses of lobbyists. The strategy allows Obama's team to reach the wealthy clients of lobbying firms while technically complying with his pledge.

Joanne Hannett, whose husband, Fred, is a lobbyist for UnitedHealth Group and other clients, is helping raise money for Obama. Although Fred Hannett attended an Obama event, he said he has not personally donated any money or "solicited any of my clients."

Obama also has no prohibition against using state lobbyists to raise money, even when they represent companies with business before the federal government.

"I like that he is not accepting money from federal lobbyists," said Bellamy, a onetime federal lobbyist who now lobbies the Maryland legislature for such clients as Internet giant AOL and defense contractor Lockheed Martin. "I think people find that interesting and insightful that he won't be beholden to those with interests before the federal government."

Obama spokesman Bill Burton said the rule "isn't a perfect solution to the problem and it isn't even a perfect symbol, but it is representative of the kind of administration Obama is going to have."

Pritzker said Obama could have fundraising momentum after the first quarter. "I think that cycle between excitement and enthusiasm and money is beginning, and I think it is really feeding on itself," she said. "It feels very solid."

Certainly, the mood in the Washington ballroom reflected that. Fundraisers left with red folders stuffed with campaign contacts and the dates of coming events. They clamored to join policy advisory groups and pledged to seize on the mood Obama referred to -- the palpable desire for political change.

Still, Obama faces the prospect of an energized Clinton campaign, armed with a donor list of 250,000 names it has not fully tapped. And even Obama's fundraising success could have a downside if it undermines the contrast he has sought to draw between himself and his rivals.

Speaking to voters in New Hampshire earlier this month, as the news broke of his formidable first-quarter haul, he tried to remind them that he has "always tried to curb the influence of money in politics."

"Listen," he told them, "I would love not to have to raise money so I could spend all my time in town hall meetings."

© 2007 The Washington Post Company

URL: msnbc.msn.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (1965)4/15/2007 7:26:32 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Obama's Up, Clinton's Down and Edwards Has Got Trouble

news.yahoo.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (1965)4/15/2007 9:46:49 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
It's Official: Obama Tops Clinton in Primary Haul
______________________________________________________________

Multiple Storylines as Candidates File Fundraising Paperwork With the SEC

By JAKE TAPPER and DAVID CHALIAN

abcnews.go.com

April 15, 2007 — - Insurgent presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., raised $24.8 million in primary cash for his campaign -- almost 30 percent more than did frontrunner Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., with $19.1 million, the candidates' Federal Election Commission documents filed on Sunday evening indicate.

Obama also nearly tied Clinton in total donations, having raised $25.8 million compared to Clinton's $26 million -- an astounding achievement for a political novice going up against such a veteran.

These and other illuminating, cold, hard facts about the campaigns of those contending to be the 44th president of the United States were revealed this weekend as campaigns posted their first quarterly reports with the FEC.

Among the other headlines:

PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH -- Self-described fiscal conservative Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., spent 64 percent of what he took in, and assumed a stunning amount (to the tune of $1.8 million) of debt.

BIG MAMA'S WHITE HOUSE? -- Clinton, who transferred $10 million from her 2006 Senate reelection campaign account to her presidential coffers, is large and in charge when it comes to cash on hand, with $24 million at her disposal right now. Clinton has also more overall cash, with $31 million, including $6.9 million she cannot spend unless she wins the nomination.

HOME AIN'T WHERE THE CASH IS -- Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who hopes to be the first Mormon elected president, received more donations from Utah, $2.8 million, than from the state he used to govern, whose residents gave him $2.3 million.

AS DEEP, AND NARROW, AS MANHATTAN ISLAND -- Rudy Giuiani, the former mayor of New York, raised $14 million, but it came from fewer donors than any other major candidate, indicating access to big-money donors but not widespread support.

DEMOCRATIC WINDS -- Leading up to an election year anticipated to be one of difficulty for the GOP, the Democratic presidential candidates raised $27 million more than their Republican counterparts.

Numbers

The FEC reports revealed much more than wonky numbers: They tell a great deal about the campaigns.

Perhaps even more than the plethora of public polls, for example, the first quarter filings demonstrate just how difficult it will be for some of the other presidential hopefuls to compete with the big boys and girl in the field. Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, reported having $163,887 in the bank as of March 31 and former Gov. Tommy Thompson, R-Wis., reported having slightly less than that with $139,723.

Some other lessons:

1) "BURN RATE" -- One of the key indicators of whether or not a campaign is being managed efficiently is the "burn rate" -- the percentage of the money raised that the campaign spent during the same time period.

McCain is the big loser in this category. His campaign hemorrhaged money by spending 64 percent of what it raised in the first quarter. Romney spent roughly half of what he collected -- including nearly $2 million on introductory television ads in key early states such as Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina. Giuliani displayed the most spending restraint among the top three GOP contenders by only spending about 37 percent of what he raised.

Democrats -- historically tagged as the "big spenders" -- are clearly are watching their spending, comparatively. Clinton's burn rate was 26 percent, Edwards' was 24 percent, and Obama's was 27 percent.

Democratic New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson may have come up with the most clever way to keep his burn rate below 20 percent -- his campaign manager, Dave Contarino, is a volunteer who does not draw a salary from the campaign. That's a somewhat different approach than the roughly $240,000 annual salary Rudy Giuliani pays to his campaign manager, Mike DuHaime.

It can also be telling to see what these campaigns have spent money on. Clinton's campaign, eagerly competing with Obama for the endorsement of Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-S.C. -- the House majority whip and a senior member of the Congressional Black Caucus -- has donated $4,000 to Clyburn's reelection committee.

2) CASH ON HAND -- The bottom line matters. Although it is important to look at how much each candidate has raised as a measure of a campaign's strength and support, the amount of cash each candidate has in the bank affects a campaign's strategy going forward.

Clinton's transfer of $10 million from her Senate campaign account dramatically boosted the money available to her and her team heading into the second quarter of the year and has her sitting atop the entire field with more than $24 million. Obama trails her respectably but considerably, with $18.2 million cash on hand, followed by Romney with $11.8 million.

On the other side of the coin, McCain has only $5.18 million in cash on hand, about the same amount as second-tier candidate Richardson and, remarkably, $1.3 million less than his friend Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., a long shot candidate who chairs the Senate Banking Committee.

3) NUMBER OF DONORS -- Beyond the millions of dollars amassed by the leading candidates is an important indication of just how broad that support is.

Obama brought in roughly $25 million -- just $4 million more than Mitt Romney. But Obama had more than triple the number of donors -- 104,000 contributors for Obama versus Romney's 32,000.

McCain's one bright spot on the GOP side is that he can boast of significantly more donors -- roughly 50,000 people contributed to his campaign -- than his Republican rivals, perhaps indicating a broader base of support.

Clinton also had roughly 60,000 donors and Edwards had north of 40,000. Rudy Giuliani rounds out the Big 6 candidates with the most narrow network of support, having received cash from approximately 28,000 people.

4) THE INTERNET -- The cheapest and easiest way for a campaign to raise money and reach potential supporters is by having them click on to the campaign Web site and donate online.

Obama scored the most Internet money by raising $6.9 million online in the first quarter. Romney did better than any of his GOP competitors in harnessing the Internet as a fundraising tool by raising $3.3 million through its Web site and an additional $3.8 million through "Quick ComMitt" -- the campaign's online fundraising mechanism.

5) SECOND-TIER DEMOCRATS -- The intensity of the wind at Democratic backs in this first quarter is apparent by taking a look at the campaign war chests of the so-called second-tier competitors.

No Republican candidate outside of the Big 3 (Romney, Giuliani and McCain) has more than $1 million in cash on hand as of March 31.

Not so for the Democrats. Dodd ($6.4 million), Richardson ($5 million), and Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., ($2.5 million) all posted significant cash on hand totals despite the many millions being sent to Clinton, Obama and Edwards.

Who Gave?

There are conflicts and disagreements buried in those dry FEC reports -- juicy details abound about friends, colleagues, and family members squaring off in rival campaigns.

What, for instance, are we to glean from the examples of those behind NBC's "Saturday Night Live"? Old-school star Chevy Chase gave $4,600 to Clinton. Eddie Murphy kicked in $2,300 to Obama. Adam Sandler gave $2,100 to Giuliani. And their former boss, SNL executive producer Lorne Michaels, dished out $1,000 to McCain.

Likewise, are the legendary rivalries among the Pritzker clan evident in the fact that Hyatt hotel heiress Penny Pritzker is Obama's national finance chair, but her relatives Thomas, Margot and James Pritzker have given money to McCain?

Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, Jr., gave the maximum primary donation, $2,300, to McCain while his father, Jon Huntsman Sr., gave the same amount to Romney.

The woman who preceded Romney as governor of Massachusetts, Jane Swift, and who was summarily handed her hat and shown the door by GOP officials once Romney started considering a run, gave money to McCain as well.

Conversely, some donors hedged their bets and gave to more than one candidate. Hollywood mogul David Geffen gave to Obama and Edwards. Brent Scowcroft, the national security adviser for former President George H.W. Bush, gave to both McCain and Romney.

Obama's Good News; McCain's Bad

Former President Bill Clinton is one of the most popular figures in the Democratic Party; he and his wife are inarguably the definition of a power couple. On the national stage for more than 15 years, the two were called upon to help raise money for Democratic candidates quite a bit during the 2006 election -- even though Sen. Clinton had her own, however uncompetitive, re-election campaign to worry about.

That Obama, only in national office since 2004, a self-described "skinny guy with a funny name," could come within a hair of matching Clinton's overall figure raised and thump her on primary cash sent nothing short of shockwaves throughout the political world.

The achievement is all the more impressive when one considers that, unlike Clinton, Obama accepts no donations from registered lobbyists or political action committees. On Friday, as Obama's campaign checked its 104,000 donors against the database of federal lobbyists, it found cash from 49 lobbyists, totaling more than $50,000, which the campaign returned.

Conversely, with a burn rate a rival campaign official called "mind boggling," McCain -- who has had a presidential political and fundraising operation for much of the last decade -- had the most disappointing quarter.

The Arizona senator not only came in sixth in fundraising among the six major candidates, with $13 million, his FEC report indicates his campaign had spent $8.38 million, about 64 percent of what it raised.

Not even factoring in the campaign's nearly $2 million in outstanding debts, McCain begins this next, increasingly competitive quarter of the presidential race with only $5.18 million in cash on hand, far below his two closest rivals for the Republican nomination.

Romney has more than twice as much primary cash on hand as McCain -- $11.8 million -- and Giuliani has about $10.8 million available to him in the primaries. And while McCain has $1.8 million in outstanding debt, Giuliani owes $88,862. (Romney has more than $2 million in debt, but it's cash he himself loaned his campaign at its genesis, which he may or may not ever repay.)

McCain has acknowledged "disappointing" fundraising, and campaign officials say they have taken steps to correct the problem. They say they are pleased with the direction the fundraising is going -- they raised $2 million in January, $3 million in February, and $8 million in March of this year.

And McCain campaign insiders also note that former Rep. Tom Loeffler, R-Texas, is now on board and brought the national finance chairs together for a meeting this week and explained to them that the campaign is now installing high levels of accountability in its fundraising structure.

"Obviously, we would have liked to have raised more money," McCain said at a press conference in Arizona on Monday. "We'll try and do better next time."

-John Berman and Matt Stuart covering the Romney campaign, Kate Snow covering the Clinton campaign, David Muir covering the Edwards campaign, and Bret Hovell covering the McCain campaign contributed to this story.

Copyright © 2007 ABC News Internet Ventures



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (1965)4/18/2007 2:43:25 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
How Barack Obama shocked the political class and struck fund-raising gold by discovering a vein of affluent donors Hillary Clinton had never even heard of...

nymag.com

Money Chooses Sides

nymag.com



To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (1965)4/19/2007 12:20:55 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 149317
 
Hillary's Hammer Returns
___________________________________________________________

By Ben Smith
The Politico
April 18, 2007

The Clintons are back on war footing, and Harold Ickes is back at the center of things.

Ickes is technically a volunteer for the campaign known as Hillary for President. His title, carefully chosen in a world with intricate internal politics, is "Adviser to the Campaign Manager."

"I jokingly refer to myself as the Assistant Sanitation Commissioner," he said in an interview this week.

But Ickes, 67, is a legendary figure in Democratic politics, a pedigreed political street fighter known for both his loyalty and his abiding grudges. The son of a key adviser to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, he came up in New York City's reform Democratic politics and later worked in the Clinton White House. Ickes was the architect of Bill Clinton's 1996 reelection before emerging as a central figure in Hillary Rodham Clinton's 2000 Senate victory.

"In 2000, he was indispensable," said Bill de Blasio, a New York City Council member who was Clinton's 2000 campaign manager. "He was the one figure who ranged farthest across the campaign. He, in many ways, was the person who insured that all the pieces came together and had the standing to do that -- had the history, had the relationships, had the style to make all the pieces fit."

Now, Ickes said, his candidate is far readier for political combat than she was in 2000.

"What's interesting for me is to see the difference of her sureness of foot between the 2000 campaign, when she was very unsure of foot, and now," he said. "She's much more adept politically."

But Ickes is returning to his 2000 role, visiting Clinton's K Street headquarters most days while working largely behind the scenes. His standing in the Clintons' circle is a matter of constant speculation, as it has been since he was abruptly dropped in a White House staff shuffle in 1996.

"She's a United States senator, and her business is the Senate, and I'm doing other stuff," Ickes said of the last few years. "Now I'm back with much more time."

He was in the background last November, when Clinton delivered a 67 percent to 31 percent shellacking to her Republican opponent, former Yonkers mayor John Spencer. The campaign, however, blew through at least $34.4 million doing it, and supporters questioned the thousands spent on flowers and millions spent on polling and television advertisements, all of which could have been saved for the presidential campaign. (In the end, Clinton was able to transfer $10 million from her Senate race to her White House bid.)

Much of her Senate campaign's spending went to television advertising and elaborate polling, and Ickes is seen as one of the few Clinton advisers with the stature to say "no" to the consultants who received much of that money.

"When there's no real opposition and there's a fair amount of money, I think people are not as rigorous," Ickes said of the 2006 Senate campaign. "This effort is going to be a lot more rigorous. Money is harder to come by and there's many more things to spend it on."

With Ickes holding a central role in spending and staffing decisions, the first quarter's filings -- in which Clinton spent a relatively paltry $5.1 million -- produced one surprise: She has fewer staffers and fewer consultants than Sen. Barack Obama, the New York Post reported.

Along with his informal (but heavy) hand on Clinton's purse, Ickes said he has been helping in two other areas: with the political operation, where his deep ties in traditional, liberal Democratic circles are unrivaled; and with the campaign's information technology.

And while Ickes may be volunteering for Clinton, his other political activities are not a hobby. His "bread and butter," he said, is lobbying. His lobbying clients have included a nursing home association, the insurance company Equitas, the Service Employees International Union and a subsidiary of Verizon communications.

Asked if his lobbyist status produced any complications for a campaign in which a leading Clinton rival, Obama, has returned contributions from lobbyists, Ickes dismissed the concern.

"It doesn't matter much one way or the other," he said.

Perhaps Ickes' largest-scale project is Catalist, a private company born out of his open distrust in the ability of Democratic Party chairman Howard Dean to build a voter database to rival that of the Republicans. Ickes is president of the company.

"It's unclear to me," Ickes said, whether the Democratic Party's database is uniform and rich enough for a national election.

The Democratic Party's voter database, a party spokeswoman said, is fully functional and accessible through a central interface.

"Given the proven success of VoteBuilder in the 2006 elections and the overwhelmingly positive response we've had from the campaigns and state parties who used it, we are very confident in our voter file," said DNC communications director Karen Finney.

Catalist had 19 clients last electoral cycle, many of them union-backed political operations and advocacy groups, such as the Sierra Club and the AFL-CIO, Ickes said.

Adding a bit of delicacy to his position, Catalist is in talks with the Clinton campaign as well as rival Democratic primary campaigns.

"We don't take sides," he said.

Ickes himself, however, does take sides. He's known for his total loyalty to his friends and his fierce enmity for their enemies. His feud with Dean -- whom he challenged in 2005 for the job of Democratic Party chairman -- is the only open front in what otherwise has been cool civility between Dean's wing of the Democratic Party and Clinton's circle. He has described Clinton's former adviser, and current critic, Dick Morris in terms too profane to print.

Hailing from the Democratic Party's more liberal wing, Ickes has also been at odds, at times, with both Clintons' more centrist advisers, such as the pollster Mark Penn. Ickes' departure from the Clinton administration was part of a more general shift away from the Democratic base, and when he joined Hillary Clinton's campaign in 1999, he joked to The Washington Post that there was "some irony" to his return: "Fired in the West Wing, hired in the East Wing."

He was circumspect, however, on the subject of Obama.

"He's a very attractive guy. He's not of Washington, he's fresh, et cetera," Ickes said. "At some point, he is going to have to lay out his programs -- we know nothing about his programs so far -- and then people will start judging him on that."