SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: coug who wrote (227077)4/14/2007 1:34:01 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
More Con Than Neo
__________________________________________________________

By MAUREEN DOWD
Op-Ed Columnist
The New York Times
April 14, 2007

Usually, spring in Washington finds us caught up in the cherry blossoms and the ursine courtship rituals of the pandas.

But this chilly April, we are forced to contemplate the batrachian grapplings of Paul Wolfowitz, the man who cherry-picked intelligence to sell us a war with Iraq.

You will not be surprised to learn, gentle readers, that Wolfie in love is no less deceptive and bumbling than Wolfie at war.

Proving he is more con than neo, he confessed that he had not been candid with his staff at the World Bank. While he was acting holier than thou, demanding incorruptibility from poor countries desperate for loans, he was enriching his girlfriend with tax-free ducats.

He has yet to admit any real mistakes with the hellish war that claimed five more American soldiers as stunned Baghdad residents dealt with the aftermath of bombings of the Iraqi Parliament, where body parts flew, and of a bridge over the Tigris, where cars sank.

But he admitted on Thursday that he’d made a mistake when he got his sweetheart, Shaha Ali Riza, an Arab feminist who shares his passion for democratizing the Middle East, a raise to $193,590 — more than the taxpaying (and taxing) Condi Rice makes. No doubt it seemed like small change compared with the money pit of remaking Iraq — a task he once prophesied would be paid for with Iraqi oil money. Maybe he should have remunerated his girlfriend with Iraqi oil revenues, instead of ripping off the bank to advance his romantic agenda.

No one is satisfied with his apology. Not the World Bank employees who booed Wolfie and yelled, “Resign! Resign!” in the bank lobby.

Not Alison Cave, the chairwoman of the bank’s staff association, who said that Mr. Wolfowitz must “act honorably and resign.”

Not his girlfriend, who says she’s the suffering victim, forced by Wolfie’s arrival to be sent to the State Department (where, in a festival of nepotism, she reported to Liz Cheney).

And not his critics, who say Wolfie has been cherry-picking again, this time with his anticorruption crusade. They say he has used it to turn the bank into a tool for his unrealistic democracy campaign, which foundered in Baghdad, and for punishing countries that defy the United States.

Wolfie also alienated the bank by bringing two highhanded aides with him from Bushworld, aides who had helped him with Iraq. One was the abrasive Robin Cleveland, called Wolfie’s Rottweiler. The other was Kevin Kellems, known as Keeper of the Comb after his star turn in “Fahrenheit 9/11,” where he handed his boss a comb so Wolfie could slick it with spittle for TV. (Maybe his girlfriend didn’t get enough of a raise.) Like W., Wolfie is dangerous precisely because he’s so persuaded of his own virtue.

Just as Ms. Riza stood behind her man on the Iraq fiasco, so Meghan O’Sullivan stood behind W.

Ms. O’Sullivan, a bright and lovely 37-year-old redhead who is the deputy national security adviser, is part of the cordon of adoring and protective women around the president, including Condi, Harriet Miers, Karen Hughes and Fran Townsend.

Even though her main experience was helping Paul Bremer set up the botched Iraq occupation and getting a reputation back in Washington “for not knowing how much she didn’t know,” as George Packer put it in “The Assassins’ Gate,” Ms. O’Sullivan was promoted nearly two years ago to be the highest-ranking White House official working exclusively on Iraq and Afghanistan.

It was clear that she was out of her depth, lacking the heft to deal with the Pentagon and State Department, or the seniority to level with W. “Meghan-izing the problem” became a catchphrase in Baghdad for papering over chaos with five-point presentations.

But W. was comfortable with Meghan, and Meghan-izing, so he reckoned that a young woman who did not report directly to him or even have the power to issue orders to agencies could be in charge of an epic bungle, just as he thought Harriet Miers could be on the Supreme Court.

This vacuum in leadership spawned the White House plan to create a powerful war czar to oversee Iraq and Afghanistan, who could replace Ms. O’Sullivan when she leaves. The push to finally get the A-team on the case is laughably, tragically late.

The Washington Post reported that at least five retired four-star generals have refused to be considered; the paper quoted retired Marine Gen. Jack Sheehan as saying, “The very fundamental issue is, they don’t know where the hell they’re going.” I couldn’t have said it better myself.



To: coug who wrote (227077)4/14/2007 10:37:27 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
EDITORIAL: Imus should have been fired long ago

theheraldbulletin.com

Published April 13, 2007

Don Imus said something incredibly stupid. Insensitive. Hurtful. Incendiary. Racist. Sexist. ... Did we say stupid yet?

When the radio personality referred to the Rutgers University women’s basketball team as “nappy-headed hos” it was so wrong on so many levels. His words also exposed what is wrong with our society on so many levels.

Let’s start with Imus himself.

He’s a shock jock -- or he was until he was fired this week. He made his living by shocking people with his comments. He contends that his words were meant to be funny.

Evidently, many people found the content of his programs to be entertaining. That, in itself, is a sad statement: that he had a huge audience, huge enough to compel TV and radio networks to carry his program, huge enough to attract major companies to advertise on the program.

According to former MSNBC colleague Keith Olbermann, Imus’ off-air words, as well as his on-air ramblings, often unfairly attacked people — public figures, non-public figures, co-workers, etc. Olbermann said Thursday on his sports talk show “The Big Show” on ESPN Radio that Imus had been known to call female co-workers “whores.”

That he wasn’t taken off the air before the flash point of his Rutgers comments is an indictment of those who supported him in radio and TV management and through corporate sponsorship. He should have been removed long before.

Some argue that the Federal Communications Commission should step in and silence slanderous radio personalities such as Imus. But the last thing we need is more government censorship. Media outlets should police themselves and hold their programming to an acceptable social standard, resisting the urge to rake in the cash that can come from someone who appeals to an audience that feasts on such base fare. And it is the responsibility of listeners to let media management know about it — loud and clear — when offensive material airs.

Now to another troubling aspect of the Imus fallout.

When Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and other grandstanders rushed to vilify Imus, they fanned a firestorm that swirled around the Rutgers team. Let’s imagine that what Imus said had been somehow lost in the teeming sea of media voices. The Rutgers team would have gone on happily celebrating its banner season and looking forward to the next one. It will be a watershed moment in our society when racist comments are ignored as merely the banal drivel of small-minded men.

As it is, these young women — the innocent victims in all this — will be remembered as the team that was called the nappy-headed hos.

That may be the greatest crime in this entire scenario, that the targets of the comments will be inextricably linked to them for life. Thankfully, the players seem to have the character and maturity to deal with it.

And those are qualities that were lacking in many other quarters of the Imus affair.