Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (36200)	4/14/2007 3:27:13 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541933

The New York Times today has three Wolfowitz's stories. For the interested. My take now is that he will have to resign because he has completely lost the staff. Here is a link to a news analysis of Wolfowitz' position which argues that much of the discontent comes from the more general discontent with the Bush administration around the globe. While this is written by David Sanger, one of their better reporters, the argument strikes me as disingenuous. That might be one of the factors but Wolfowitz' management style looks to be a far more powerful one. nytimes.com And here's a link to an article the thesis of which is that Wolfowitz is pretty much alone on this one. nytimes.com And, finally, a short piece on Wolfowitz' companion who is at the center of the most immediate controversy. nytimes.com Oh, and I should add, the Financial Times yesterday had a second editorial calling for his resignation.