Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Suma who wrote (57731)	4/14/2007 7:04:36 PM
From: Jim S	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Thank you for posting the article, Suma. I'm confused, though. Where in the article does it outline any lies by President Bush? I see a lot of the typical hysteria and exaggeration by the MSM, but I missed any "Bush lies." I see a lot of reporting of silly rumors by the press as fact, but I missed the part where Bush led them to those silly reports. Perhaps you could clear up my confusion?

To: Suma who wrote (57731)	4/14/2007 7:40:24 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

I don't see any lies. I do know that Moyers is a die hard liberal, he hated Reagan, Bush.

To: Suma who wrote (57731)	4/14/2007 8:36:29 PM
From: J.B.C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Moyers interviews media personalities, including Dan Rather,.... Is that the same Dan Rather that's waiting to break the story that the Air National Guard memo he aired, to sway a Presidential election, was fake. LOL When will the Libs understand that the MSM will do ANYTHING in there quest to destroy a President? Including a 90 minute documentary on "lies" that just isn't factual. Jim

To: Suma who wrote (57731)	4/14/2007 9:49:45 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

lol What a bunch of crap.

To: Suma who wrote (57731)	4/15/2007 10:23:30 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

<< "This is a post to Sully who asked me about three weeks ago to give him one lie Bush told. I did not want to get into IT with him so I just declined." >> So why didn't you post your reply to me then Suma? Care to explain?

To: Suma who wrote (57731)	4/15/2007 10:43:55 AM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 90947

Suma, I actually asked you to provide verbatim quotes to a few genuine examples of significant lies "this administration has foisted" on "the American people". I read that article you posted very carefully. It does not contain one single "genuine" lie by Bush or anyone from his Administration. That is an undeniable fact that can be conclusively proven with facts supported by credible, independently verifiable evidence. In fact, I bet I have exposed you to much of that evidence already. When you initially failed to respond to my challenge, I told you the following: You rely almost exclusively on your opinions & the opinions of others. Too often you confuse opinions with fact. Just because someone says something that appeals to your political beliefs does not make them factual or accurate. The article you posted is a prime example of that. It is written by a Bush hating liberal who, like you, relied on the false OPINIONS of other Bush hating liberals. What you posted is a bunch of lies & intentional misrepresentations by Bush hating liberals who falsely claim Bush lied. Once again someone said something that appealed to your political beliefs & you chose to believe them. No matter how badly you wish it were so, those false assertions & 3rd party OPINIONS are not facts. They never were facts. And they never will be facts no matter how much you want it to be. Message 23397295 Message 23401104 Message 23404121