SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (333354)4/16/2007 3:14:04 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570977
 
Maybe. Who knows what would have happened if we had only nuked one? Or not nuked a city at all, but say, an island off of Tokyo.


Either way, I am quite sure they would have surrendered. In fact, I am quite sure they would have surrendered after nuking just Hiroshima.

Do you think it was easier to nuke Japanese cities as opposed to German ones because they didn't look so much like us?



To: combjelly who wrote (333354)4/18/2007 11:25:26 AM
From: TimF  Respond to of 1570977
 
Even after nuking two of their cities (and bombing the hell out of the rest of them with conventional and incendiary bombs, and blockading the country, each of which caused more death than the nukes) there was a lot of opposition to surrender including an unsuccessful coup attempt by those opposed to the surrender.

Fortunately this wasn't necessary.

en.wikipedia.org

fas.org