Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pgerassi who wrote (230042)	4/15/2007 1:49:00 PM
From: dougSF30	Respond to of 275872

Pete, I'd put the odds on AMD having better 45nm yields than Intel at about 1 in 20. Further, AMD will be 1 year+ behind Intel on 45nm. You continue to simply make things up, like your thoroughly debunked claims from yesterday regarding AMD's process timing.

To: pgerassi who wrote (230042)	4/16/2007 9:25:48 AM
From: smooth2o	Respond to of 275872

re: The advantage for double patterning is that it can be done with existing 65nm equipment at the cost of wafer throughput and edge definition, If Intel wasn't accurate in wafer positioning, it would even be worse use double patterning.The advantage for double patterning is that it can be done with existing 65nm equipment at the cost of wafer throughput and edge definition, If Intel wasn't accurate in wafer positioning, it would even be worse use double patterning. Sorry Pete, wrong again. Looks like everyone will have to go to double patterning. Intel's just ahead of the curve... Double Patterning Wrings More From Immersion Lithography With high-index immersion looking less hopeful than some may have hoped, the industry is abuzz with talk about double patterning as the sledgehammer approach to extending water-based optical lithography. reed-electronics.com Smooth