To: Brumar89 who wrote (94516 ) 4/15/2007 11:01:42 PM From: Kevin Rose Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976 Pure nonsense. "Taxing the rich" always means taxing the middle class too. Example - the AMT started out as a tax to prevent millionaires from avoiding income tax by selective investment - now it punishes upper middle income people. The income tax itself started out as a tax on only the rich, now everyone pays. The phasing out of child credits and deductions affects my family and we're a double income professional and school teacher family. Having paid a good deal of AMT in my time, I agree that it can be unfair. So, raise the limit. Simple solution. Remove the tax cuts targeted towards those earning more than, say, $500,000 per year. Again, simple.There are two sides to this. Just label goods by origin - already done and let people be free to buy what they want or not. Banning imports hurts poor consumers. And the impact of imports may be overstated. I've read Walmart imports $18B of goods from China yet when I look at their financial statements I see their cost of goods sold was $258B last year - where is the rest coming from? Well, maybe some from Mexico, Indonesia, etc. but its not all coming from overseas. Agree. And don't let them use the bogus 'Assembled in the USA' crap.As far as I know the US used waterboarding on something less than two dozen foreign terrorists, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Despite the claims I don't believe we're using widespread torture. I don't know what you mean by 'widespread', but it appears to have been systematic at Gitmo. Also, there are the secret 'locations' of CIA prisoners spirited away to countries more adept at torture than we are.Warrants aren't needed for foreign monitoring and thats been the position of every administration since Carters. One end of the conversation was in the US, so, yes, a judicial approval would be needed. Foreign terrorists captured fighting Americans abroad don't have and shouldn't have habeas corpus. Much as we despised them, the Taliban was the official government of Afghanistan. Nationals and even foreign fighters fighting against our invasion would be classified as enemy combatants, which means the Geneva Convention should have applied to them. Also, the government has the ability to label YOU or ME an enemy combatant, at which time our rights to being charged in a timely fashion, trial, representation, etc are all gone.What? The FBI didn't open Moussawi's laptop before 911. Think they should have? The FBI's recent abuses of the Patriot act should cause us all alarm and consternation. Because it CAN be you and me. Besides, I don't need to be robbed, assaulted, or murdered to know that having laws that punish those who do is a good thing. I don't need to personally have my records searched and my rights taken to see that it is unAmerican and unConstitutional.