Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: roguedolphin who wrote (4956)	4/16/2007 5:03:10 AM
From: Gib Bogle	Respond to of 50528

I have no idea why you think I might be afraid to watch something. I might be bored, or irritated, but afraid? I did take the time to watch Loose Change, and wasn't impressed by the level of journalism. I'm very impressed by the extent to which the Bush gang have destroyed faith in the US government, and made people ready to believe in really far-fetched conspiracy ideas. The loss of confidence in Bush and his cohorts is certainly a good thing as far as I'm concerned. But I'm not one to jump out of the frying pan into the fire - all lies are bad in my book.

To: roguedolphin who wrote (4956)	4/16/2007 6:00:16 AM
From: Gib Bogle	Respond to of 50528

"Have you watched this presentation yet???" I'm trying. The first interesting thing I note is that this guy is a double for Karl Rove. Next I note a strange celebratory atmosphere in the hall. Cheering, yeehawing, laughing, whistling, like for a good standup performance. This audience doesn't sound as if they are hearing the dread news about the takeover of the government by a fascist conspiracy. They seem to be enjoying the entertainment. Hinkley-Bush connection. So what? Gulf of Tonkin. Yes, we knew about that at least 20 years ago. Able Danger are the terrorist controllers. Any evidence? Let's see what he has. No evidence so far, just statements presented as facts without substantiation. The WTC collapses. Shaped charges not enough. Nanotechnology. Lasers. Silly stuff - he speaks as if he knows something about structural engineering, but he doesn't. Now the pentagon. The hole is too small. What is he saying, no plane hit? Cruise missile, planted explosives. So where are the passengers on these flights? This is not at all convincing. A mish-mash of claims without evidence, very fragmentary, no comprehensive alternative explanation. Not worth taking seriously. If Tarpley were onto something, and the conspirators were as clever and ruthless as he claims, he would have met with an accident long ago.