Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (38360)	4/16/2007 2:47:52 PM
From: xenon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78409

That is why I changed all my CKG's shares for the warrants. Claude any thought about Dynasty's news? Looks DMM'S price is very cheap, no?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (38360)	4/16/2007 3:26:09 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78409

Claude: " The reason has always to do with the probability of the underlying security to move much higher before the warrants expires. In the case of CKG, the probability is extremely high, so the warrants has a large premium." If that is true Claude, then why were the Silver Wheaton B wts, 5 year wts, for sale for a buck all day long when the stock was just a tad out of the money. They hosrtly htereafter rose to an approximate relative price as the CKG wts are now. In fact if you go look back you will see there was little difference in the silver wheaton wts and the CKG wts in terms price fo stock at the time, distance to strike and market conditions. And certainly silver Wheaton has as much status as CKG??