Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (11578)	4/16/2007 3:32:00 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

So rat brain, how is this false? And why do you in a cowardly manner hide behind an anonymous handle and libel exxon folks with innuendo. Your conduct seems consistant with that of a whore. And if you look through the summary, you will find no mention of the fact that the weather satellite observations of the last twenty years show no global warming. In fact, a slight cooling. In fact, you will not even find satellites mentioned in the summary. Now, why is that? These are the only global observations we have. These are the best observations we have. They cover the whole globe. The surface observations don't cover the whole globe. They leave out large chunks of the globe. They don't cover the oceans very well, which is 70 percent of the globe. Dr. S. Fred Singer (described at the link as "an atmospheric physicist at George Mason University and founder of the Science and Environmental Policy Project

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (11578)	4/16/2007 3:54:39 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 36917

One of the most tiresome arguments the globalonists use to try to marginalize skeptics is that the skeptics are funded by corporate money or have some other personal ax to grind. The tactic should be considered out of order, but since they used it first, and have used it hundreds of times already, the question should be turned around: How objective are you if your very ability to make a living as a "climate scientist" depends on getting grants from a government that appears to be dominated by globalarmists?