SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (17249)4/16/2007 8:29:53 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 218620
 
That was then ... iht.com ... usa killing unarmed and large groups of refugees, men women and children, as a matter of policy approved at the highest levels, a war blatant crime, by the highest levels

Pentagon withheld document from report on Korean War killings
By Charles J. Hanley and Martha Mendoza The Associated PressPublished: April 15, 2007

Six years after declaring that the killing of Korean War refugees by U.S. troops at No Gun Ri was "not deliberate," the U.S. Army has acknowledged it had found, but had not divulged, a high-level document stating that the U.S. military had a policy of shooting approaching civilians in South Korea.

The document, a letter from the U.S. ambassador in South Korea to the State Department in Washington, is dated the day in 1950 when U.S. troops began the No Gun Ri shootings, in which, survivors said, hundreds of people, mostly women and children, were killed.

Exclusion of the embassy letter from the army's 2001 investigative report on No Gun Ri, a village in central South Korea, is the most significant of numerous omissions of documents and testimony pointing to a policy of firing on refugee groups. The undisclosed evidence was uncovered through Associated Press archival research and Freedom of Information Act requests.

South Korean petitioners say that hundreds more refugees died later in 1950 as a result of the U.S. practice. The Seoul government is investigating one such large-scale killing, of refugees stranded on a beach, newly confirmed by U.S. archives.

Sahr Conway-Lanz, a Harvard historian, disclosed the existence of Ambassador John Muccio's 1950 letter in a scholarly article and a 2006 book, "Collateral Damage." He found the declassified letter at the U.S. National Archives.

When asked about the letter last year, the Pentagon did not address the central question of whether U.S. investigators had seen the document before issuing their No Gun Ri report. Louis Caldera, a former army secretary, suggested to The Associated Press that army researchers may have missed it.

But after South Korea asked for more information, the Pentagon acknowledged to Seoul that it had examined the Muccio letter in 2000 but dismissed it. It did so because the letter "outlined a proposed policy," not an approved one, Paul Boyce, an army spokesman, argued in a recent e-mail message.

But Muccio's letter to Dean Rusk, then an assistant secretary of state, says unambiguously that "decisions made" at a high-level U.S.-South Korean meeting in Taegu, South Korea, on July 25, 1950, included a policy of shooting approaching refugees. The reason: U.S. commanders feared that disguised North Korean troops were infiltrating their lines via refugee groups.

"If refugees do appear from north of US lines they will receive warning shots, and if they then persist in advancing they will be shot," the ambassador told Rusk, cautioning that these shootings might cause "repercussions in the United States." Deliberately attacking noncombatants is a war crime.

Told of the Pentagon rationale for excluding the letter from its report, Yi Mahn Yol, a retired head of the National Institute of Korean History in Seoul and an expert on No Gun Ri, suggested that it was suppressed because it was "disadvantageous" to the Pentagon's case.

"If they set it aside as nothing significant, we can say that it was an intentional exclusion," he said.

Conway-Lanz called the Pentagon's explanation "thoroughly unconvincing."

On July 25, 1950, survivors of the event said, U.S. soldiers forced them out of villages. On July 26th, survivors said, they were stopped in front of U.S. lines and attacked without warning by aircraft as hundreds sat atop a railroad embankment near No Gun Ri. Troops of the 7th U.S. Cavalry Regiment followed with ground fire, they said, as survivors took shelter in twin underpasses of a concrete railroad bridge.

The killings remained hidden from history until 1999, when an AP report cited a dozen former soldiers who corroborated the survivor accounts. The veterans' estimates of the dead ranged from fewer than 100 to hundreds. Survivors say they believe about 400 people were killed. No evidence emerged of enemy infiltrators at No Gun Ri.

As 1950 wore on, U.S. commanders repeatedly ordered refugees shot, according to declassified documents. One incident, on Sept. 1, 1950, has been confirmed by the declassified official diary of the USS DeHaven. The diary says that the navy destroyer, at army insistence, fired on a seaside refugee encampment at Pohang, South Korea. Survivors say 100 to 200 people were killed.

Writer Jae-soon Chang in Seoul and investigative researcher Randy Herschaft in New York contributed to this report.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (17249)4/16/2007 8:32:40 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218620
 
... and this is now ... it will turn out that this round of usa killing unarmed men, women and children is also policy, authorized at the highest levels, per rules of engagement, to be revealed many years later ... and believe you voted for bush, no? that little girl's blood is on your hands. no?

iht.com

Rights group assails U.S. marines in killings of Afghans
By Carlotta Gall Published: April 15, 2007

KABUL: U.S. marines reacted to a bomb ambush in eastern Afghanistan last month with excessive force, hitting groups of bystanders and vehicles with machine-gun fire in a rampage that covered 10 miles of highway and left 12 civilians dead, including an infant and three elderly men, according to a report published by an Afghan human rights commission.

The report, which was released Saturday, said families of the victims had said that they demanded justice last week from the U.S. military and the Afghan government and that they described the aftermath of the shootings, in Nangarhar Province.

One 16-year-old newly married girl was cut down while she carried a bundle of grass to her family's farmhouse, according to her family and the report. A 75-year-old man walking to his shop was hit by so many bullets that his son did not recognize the body when he arrived at the scene.

In the weeks immediately after the episode, the U.S. military began an investigation, and it is exploring possible criminal charges, senior military officials said. The marines involved in the episode are being kept in Afghanistan, but the rest of their 120-man company has been pulled out of the country.

A U.S. spokesman in Afghanistan, Lieutenant Colonel David Accetta, said Saturday that the military was in the final stages of approving condolence payments for families of the wounded and dead in the shootings.

In its report, the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission condemned the suicide bomb attack that initially struck a convoy of a Marine Special Operations unit March 4, wounding one American, and said there may also have been small-arms fire directed at the convoy immediately after the blast. But it said the response had been disproportionate, especially given the obviously nonmilitary nature of the Marines' targets long after the ambush.

"In failing to distinguish between civilians and legitimate military targets, the U.S. Marine Corps Special Forces employed indiscriminate force," the report said. "Their actions thus constitute a serious violation of international humanitarian standards."

A spokesman for the military's Central Command said the Afghan report had been forwarded to Admiral William Fallon, the senior U.S. officer in the region, for review.

The deputy director of the human rights commission, Nader Nadery, warned that incidents like the highway shooting had undercut efforts by coalition forces to win people's support away from the Taliban.

"There is a high level of frustration among the public and civilians that they are victims of both sides of the conflict," he said.