Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (333637)	4/16/2007 9:43:07 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573213

Sure, but this was a war of aggression YOU supported and still support. Are you proud?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (333637)	4/17/2007 6:59:07 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573213

JCP, > Quite a different situation than Iraq, where WE were the aggressors. We were the "aggressors" in a lot of wars. Maybe Lincoln should be blamed for the deaths of millions of Americans for "starting" the Civil War. Had the South simply seceded like they wanted to, we could have avoided all of that bloodshed. First, hundreds of thousands died during the Civil War, not millions. Secondly, there are historians who contend Lincoln should have let the South go. But that runs counter to the American need to muscle people into doing what it wants.