SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: maceng2 who wrote (11588)4/17/2007 7:00:46 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 36917
 
Yes, I had read about the possible "dimming." Another indication of how big of a problem it is to sort all of this out.

Another glitch is talked about by Singer in this PBS discussion. pbs.org The models all show a "stright line" growth of warming with additional CO2. Yet it doesn't work that way.

As I keep saying, the more you look at it, the bigger the problem in sorting it out. That's why this "rush to judgement" by the left and their Scientists is so scary.



To: maceng2 who wrote (11588)4/17/2007 1:29:42 PM
From: mistermj  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
That is a great debunking of the global warming hysterics.

Thanks for sharing.



To: maceng2 who wrote (11588)4/17/2007 2:35:14 PM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
Global Dimming does NOT disprove Global Warming. The fact of the matter is that Global Dimming has dampened Global Warming.
As air quality is improving (thanks to clean air acts), Global Dimming is abating and that is the primary reason behind the recent acceleration of GW. GW will become more and more important in the coming years and we are rapidly approaching the point-of-no-return (if no action is done). Ignore GW at your peril.