SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (334078)4/19/2007 8:46:29 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1572631
 
we need to tax your speech, one dollar for every word you type. That should give the rest of us some peace and quite



To: Elroy who wrote (334078)4/19/2007 10:12:16 AM
From: d[-_-]b  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572631
 
Never paid a fee in OR or WA.

There is a one time $200 transfer fee on Full Auto.

A tax would not do anything but limit the total number of guns owned by any single person and probably create a huge black market of untaxed guns. A $300 gun with a $700 yearly tax would be a really negative legal ownership motivation.

This Cho guy still would only have paid $60 tax for the short time he owned his $520 glock since he only had it a month.

Next idea please. :-)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News