Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ralphty who wrote (62959)	4/21/2007 10:08:41 PM
From: JeffreyHF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 196991

We don`t need a "free joiner", born on today`s date, to stir the pot. Maurice is indeed a rare jewel, and a great asset to this board, providing intelligence, eloquence, humour, and insight, mixed with wicked wit. But I don`t read him as being down on the Qualcomm company; rather, the nature certain aspects and inhabitants of the world within which they function.

To: ralphty who wrote (62959)	4/23/2007 7:00:15 AM
From: ralphty	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 196991

The question remains unanswered: Why did members of this forum turn against Maurice Winn so quickly and strongly when he criticized Qualcomm? This is what Mr. Rich Bloem, who is, from what I can tell, one of the more esteemed members of this forum, wrote in post 62944 to Maurice Winn: "Now then, you could also lay off the sauce and the world may become clear again." Nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So now Maurice Winn is a drunkard because he criticized Qualcomm.