SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sam who wrote (36632)4/22/2007 10:29:50 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541930
 
Good grief, Elroy, I wish you were writing satire. I fear you're not though.

I'm just writing things as I see them. You're probably reading something into my writing that is not there - you seem to think there is something in what I wrote that says the coalition invasion was a justified, good thing. I didn't say that - I didn't make any judgement on the decision to go into Iraq. I'm not judging coalition action in Iraq as right or wrong, or justified or unjustified, I'm just stating the facts.

The coalition won the war with Saddam's regime. If the US leaves Iraq a year from now, the US will not have been defeated in anything other than the part of the activity in Iraq that was designed to make life for Iraqis post-Saddam comparable to what most people in the developed countries on the planet enjoy. Saying the US is experiencing defeat in Iraq now is comparable to saying the NGOs are being defeated in Darfur. The NGOs may be failing to help the people of Darfur, but the NGOs are still around. Generally, when a nation gets defeated, it gets destroyed, as in what happened to Saddam's regime.



To: Sam who wrote (36632)4/22/2007 10:39:48 AM
From: Elroy  Respond to of 541930
 
What is incredible to me is that I think it's possible that you actually believe that you are making sense here, just telling a "simple" truth.

Everything I wrote makes sense. Which part was illogical to you?