SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: arun gera who wrote (17566)4/22/2007 4:33:35 PM
From: Slagle  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218800
 
Arun,
Maybe I am a nut, just like RJA says. <grin>

Here maybe, is how I came to look first for evidence of conspiracy when confronted with a total anomaly of the type that have become serial in nature during my lifetime:

I have an accidental family connection to a former American president, a fairly close one by some measures. As it happened I had met the guy in a private setting about ten years before his election when he was a statewide politician and of course followed his career with great interest from that time. In addition, when he went to Washington, a bunch of people I had know all my life went with him, including a neighbor who served in his cabinet.

Now I didn't go up to Washington and hang out in the Oval Office or even sleep in the Lincoln bedroom. But I know folks who did, and some of what transpired there leaked out at the time by way of personal contacts and very much more has emerged during the decades hence.

Now I don't claim to have learned via this connection who shot JFK or even whether the government is covering up UFO contacts. <grin>

But I did learn many things, including much that I am not about to post here. But believe me, at a certain level, things are not what they seem, especially with regards to the media.
Slagle



To: arun gera who wrote (17566)4/23/2007 8:56:37 AM
From: Metacomet  Respond to of 218800
 
"So if they are against Bush, they are ready to believe that the neocons/Bush/Cheney are the the conspirators in the Iraq attack, they are an aberration, while the rest of the US policy is balanced.

Could you translate this?