Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (203746)	4/22/2007 3:51:56 PM
From: Ish	Respond to of 793842

<<No gun control law will change that because no jury will convict an innocent gun owner solely for the crime of owning a gun.>> Last year a suburban home in the Chicago area was broken into, robbed, plus a vehicle was stolen. Owner bought a 9mm. Crook came back a few days later while the family was getting ready for bed and got himself shot to death. The police wanted to arrest the father because it's against the law to have a handgun in that suburb. Public out cry was so strong that they dropped the charges but kept the gun.

To: carranza2 who wrote (203746)	4/23/2007 3:21:06 AM
From: ig	Respond to of 793842

The question is what do the innocents who are potential victims of these criminals and psychopaths to do? Each side in this debate is trying to be the one that decides what the question is. Each side wants to be the one that frames the question -- and they are talking past each other.