SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pgerassi who wrote (231045)4/22/2007 10:09:33 PM
From: Dan3Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re: You can whittle the users down on the virtual servers by running the primary Oracle on a single physical server with a hot spare (only activated when the primary goes down)(typical three tier setup).

That's how we do it. We use CA's XOSoft WanSyncHA to do automatic startup then failover for the hot spare.

Great minds think alike. :-) Unfortunately, WanSync doesn't do failover for Linux hosted Oracle. We do run the middle tier boxes on Linux.

Oracle seems to be disk and memory limited more often than CPU, and in cases where it isn't we can load additional instances on a box, so we usually need to add more disk and RAM (need another box) more often than CPU. I don't think we have "typical" applications, so we likely have atypical "best" configurations.

I've got a grunch of dev and test boxes that need windows licenses. My first evaluation experiences with VMWare weren't very encouraging, so, since I have to pay for the software for each virtual instance anyway, and I'd just as soon be able to reboot a runaway box, I've been sticking with lots of little boxes (single populated socket 1U servers without redundant power supplies, for the most part). Given that virtual servers are probably easier to manage under such circumstances, I know I need to migrate those platforms to virtual servers. But where's the time?

Are you at an FFRDC?

Regards,

Dan