Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (62996)	4/23/2007 1:00:45 AM
From: ihavenoidea	Respond to of 197001

I find "what if"s are good for my future. Waiting to see what happens is hazardous for my future. I agree. So "what if" Nokia's lawyers say: "Ms. Jury, why is Qcom saying i'm infringing on their GSM edge/smedge patents when they show no (hidden) royalities from any other phone maker for the same type infringment? Does Motorola pay q a royalty for use of their GSM patents? does Samsung?", Does Sanyo/Ericcson? Does any phone manufacturer pay qcom anything for what they are accusing Nokia of infringing? I say, Ms. Jury, I am from Misssouri, and we should have Qcom "Show me". Otherwise they should be ashamed of themselves for wasting yours, mine, and most of all the court's time." So, what if I'm right? Huh. What if?! I have no idea, but if my beloved qcom isn't recieving royalties from another box makerfor the patents they are claiming Nokia is infringing upon, than logic is Nokia isn't infringing. And the jury will say that not only does Qcom have dirty hands, and GSM Guild type slimey feet. We will finally have lowered ourselves to the level of Nokia/Siemens. i.