Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RJA_ who wrote (17575)	4/23/2007 11:51:07 AM
From: Slagle	Respond to of 218805

RJA, You are right on the mark with most of that, I completely agree. Most of it anyway. And yes, it is very likely that J6P will get very pissed and he needs to, for if he is not careful his children will wind up slaves in their own country. He has been sold down the river by his "leaders" and he is in great danger of loosing everything. And there could be war and destruction, maybe lots of it, but like your examples that is nothing new in the world and some revolutions turn out quite well, maybe this one will also, if it comes. I am hopeful. You are right on the mark with regards to "small self sufficient communities" and this gets right to a great danger inherent in the present arrangement. Instead of "small, local and self sufficient" the globalists plan is to have a tiny unaccountable clique run the whole world. Their project is already well under way. They intend to turn the whole world into a sort of "colony" to be managed for their benefit, like a plantation. This is really something new in the world. All down through history each nation has been self governing, the exception being the conquered and the colonies. This implies a certain degree of accountability, even a king or a dictator is accountable to his subjects, to a degree. Lack of accountability is a huge problem, but maybe an even greater danger is related to the scope and scale of the globalist enterprise. Let me try to explain this with a personal example: RJA, don't ever think for even a minute that a "leader" like say a Jimmy Carter for example, is ONE BIT more capable or qualified than you are. He is not. The same would hold true for Algore, Bush, Clinton or George Soros for that matter. They are just human, "little men" like all the rest of us. And there arises the failing of the globalist scheme related to scope and scale. Soros or Jimmy Carter could probably do a great job running a small business or as the mayor of a town or city, a passable job as governor of a state and likely a very poor job as a national leader. You see the problem, related to scope and scale? Now you have a very tiny group of "little men" who would try to run the whole world. Better to have strong, small nation-states that look after their own interests, then you have accountability and have solved the problem of scope and scale by the device of placing the scale of the task within the range of human capabilities. Slagle