SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robohogs who wrote (23519)4/23/2007 11:48:29 AM
From: Biomaven  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 52153
 
Someone thinks news is coming in next 4 weeks

I don't know of any publicly-disclosed basis for that view. Could be some sort of rumor from the FDA I suppose.

Merger seems very unlikely - Novartis is obvious candidate, and there are issues surrounding inside information (like communications received from the FDA) that make that seem very unlikely indeed.

There is still a fairly hefty implied volatility premium of the puts over the calls at some maturities, perhaps suggesting some sort of short squeeze.

All-in-all the implied volatility surface makes no sense to me here. Why the spike in May vols? Why is the put premium higher for longer-dated contracts?

Peter



To: Robohogs who wrote (23519)4/24/2007 4:52:31 AM
From: Robohogs  Respond to of 52153
 
As a follow up to my 2 notes yesterday on MNTA vol, the numbers came in about 15% more (were 130% last week, 120% on Friday and now down to 106% vs. 96% a week ago) but still some room to come in a bit. The vols are a bit high across all months.

Jon



To: Robohogs who wrote (23519)4/24/2007 9:40:22 AM
From: CapitalistHogg™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52153
 
Moving on to more volatile stocks, DNDN. I notice the vols are in the same place almost exactly for puts and calls - at 226.1%. ...

FWIW i noticed the same thing. very unusual for a biotech which has exploded on good news.