Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (334950)	4/23/2007 8:24:45 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574001

What may have been appropriate a century or two centuries ago may not be appropriate now So you now acknowledge the past interpretation of the 2nd has always been an individual right? In the first years of the country before it was capable of putting together a standing army......yes, the second amendment made some sense. But that changed and by the Civil War we had no problem creating two standing armies. And what country wants all its 300 million residents to have guns, second amendment or no second amendment.