SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (63038)4/23/2007 9:53:26 PM
From: quartersawyer  Respond to of 197732
 
bodes well for QCOM. Could just as soon bode ill.

As this is the perfect tempest in a teapot, a right thinking IT Commission would dismiss within fifteen seconds the idea of severe remedy, except maybe a 1/8% bond on chipsets pending decisions on Q's assertion that the patent is invalid from the get-go.

The Commission is into a Dickensian self-aggrandizing puffery. The OUII "staff" in their absurdly harsh recommendations are transparently bucking for big futures in law for ROW corporations x-Qualcomm. The Paula Sterns et al are completely full of it, will say anything for a buck. Shameful and irrational altogether, more like WWF than defense of fair trade. So who knows what kind of bullshit is next?



To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (63038)4/23/2007 10:18:30 PM
From: manalagi  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 197732
 
Should the ITC commission follow ALJ's recommendation of not banning the import, will BRCM come back and sue QCOM for damages or triple damages for infringement? Is it not the court which has the jurisdiction for awarding monetary compensation?