Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (228340)	4/24/2007 2:38:01 AM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Lets just agree that if Bush's goal had been to NOT go to war with Iraq, the "evidence" presented to those Dems would have looked startlingly different. QED.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (228340)	4/24/2007 2:59:43 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"We were lied to" is the mantra they have decided to adopt to avoid responsibility for their actions in voting for the war in 2002, I think they voted to authorize GB to use force if all other means failed, and it was GB who decided to use it. Giving GB the power to go to war and voting for war are not exactly the same thing. I give my wife the power to decide which car to buy, and if she buys a lemon I can be upset with her. It's sort of splitting hairs, but the final decision was made by the "decider".