Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (228386)	4/24/2007 6:02:02 AM
From: kumar	Respond to of 281500

Give u an example where such a concept has worked : India : - The President is the Commander in Chief and has authority to declare war based on advice given. The President also has authority to fire the Prime Minister, dissolve Parliament and ask for new elections to be held. - The Prime Minister is the head of the Executive branch of Govt - The Speaker of the Houses are the heads of the legislative branch - The Supreme Court is the head of the judicial branch - the Military reports to the President, but its day to day affairs are managed by the Defence Minister - a Cabinet position that reports to the Prime Minister. However, neither the Defence Ministry nor the Prime Minister can order the Military into war. One quirk in this scenario is : the Prime Minister is the nominated person from the winning party in the Legislative branch. He / she does not have to be elected.