Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LoneClone who wrote (38983)	4/26/2007 4:07:38 PM
From: loantech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78411

Let's go Idaho forget Peru and Mexico. <G>

To: LoneClone who wrote (38983)	4/26/2007 4:41:06 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78411

sf.v - right back to the .13 of three months ago ... december's placement will be free-trading now, no doubt ... plus the two main principals have a uranium play going, iea.v, so attention will be divided [and not evenly either i betcha] ... i'm thinking of blowing it out and moving on ... so, that probably means the logical thing to do is grit my teeth and add a few, then cast around for someone to bitch at ... let's blame stan! goz.v - they had news out this morning, nice intersections, both infill and stepout, foiled my plan to add at a chart-determined price ... oh well, there's always tomorrow, and maybe monday too [last day of the calendar month] [as opposed to the three-day settlement brokers' month] lgo.v - i'd like more, but it goes against the grain to buy above a gap ... might just bid .72ish and leave it at that, see what happens sgm.v - did i see a post where you'd sold Sutter? ... i've been adding a bit [though not today] ... think they'll make a mine there sooner or later