To: Madharry who wrote (26676 ) 10/16/2007 1:19:45 AM From: Paul Senior Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78516 Okay, Madharry, I'll adjust my modis operandi. Instead of just passing on your "best ideas" post because I could not ascertain the reasons why they might have been a (value) buy for me, I'll just ask you. Back then in April in, "Right now my best 8 ideas are: EDV.to CHK CNQ MFCAF SSALF(assuming either buyout is not approved or approved at higher price), PLG.to, Mog.to, SIL.", why are dink companies PLG, MOG in that list? They have no earnings, and historical information (p/bk, p/sales) are not quickly found (by me, anyway). I find no obvious reason why I ought to consider these stocks as buy from the post or a brief scan. Why, of all the stocks in the universe, are these two companies anywhere near "best ideas" and/or appropriate for a value investor? I presume your "best idea" were stocks that you were actually buying or have bought. (No insult intended; just want to confirm. We do have some people around here who sometimes give out stock ideas/recommendations, but don't always back them up by putting any skin in the game.) Is there a correlation between your best stock ideas and their subsequent stock performance? That is, do your best idea stocks do better than stocks that you have that are not your best ideas? I ask this, because for me, my 'best ideas' almost never turn out to be my best performers. For me I see not much relationship between my best ideas and how these stocks will perform compared to my less enthusiastic choices and their performance. --------------------------------------- (As of today, I hold CHK, CNQ, SIL, EDVMF. CHK, CNQ, I can understand (very superficially); EDVMF sorta, although it's much more a bet on you and that you got the analysis right - which, as of today anyway, seems to be the case -g-)