Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E_K_S who wrote (26677)	4/27/2007 2:11:32 AM
From: Paul Senior	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78516

EKS, yes pretty difficult to weigh one Canroy against another unless a person studies their different strategies, location differences, capital base, acquisition policy, dividend policies, etc. That'd be a swot analysis. (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats). Too tough for me. I have bought a package of Canroys. I'd consider adding PEYUF, although I'm already in natural gas with some other Canroys. I like PMBIF because it's a pipeline/storage/transport operator and not an e&p type Canroy like the others I have. It's got the dividend, long-term commitments, new pipelines opening up, and it's not a limited partnership like a lot of USA pipeline companies. (I don't like limited partnership K-1 forms for taxes (USA).) Imo, okay to include PMBIF if one is buying a diverse basket of Canroys. It'd be one of my eight favorites (see Madharry post), if I had any favorites. In general my latest purchases are my favorites (or else I wouldn't be buying them). Of course, since PMBIF is a pipeline operator essentially, with PMBIF I'm looking more for stability with this one and not quick gains or multibagger performance.