Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (204347)	4/27/2007 9:53:23 AM
From: Rambi	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 793998

delete - sorry- wrong thread!

To: DMaA who wrote (204347)	4/27/2007 10:06:58 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793998

There's still time to correct your post. No correction needed. You ignored the "except, of course, on those pesky occasions where 2 to 3 could be required," which would, of course, be for "cleaning the[ir] behind." The overwhelming proportion of her trips to the rest room would not be for "cleaning her behind" but rather for catching that last drip, an function that could be accomplished easily with one square (even if that square were only one ply <g>). For that "pesky" once-a-day activity, she allows two or three. It's not valid to insist that she proposes folks "clean their behind[s]" with one square. Surely "two or three" squares is practically as good a basis for ridicule.