Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (204381)	4/27/2007 11:31:15 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794001

I gave a couple of reasons why it was reasonable to assume that she was serious when she posted her TP thoughts. "Reasonable to assume that she was serious" is fine with me. I have no problem with that. That's not belief with certainty. I responded to LB's post, which read: It was not a joke. She MEANT it. You have no idea how narcissistic these Hollywood lefties get. That's belief with certainty, which is unwarranted. Everything else I posted, be it to you or others, was in the context of my response to him. I have argued only that she MIGHT have been joking to counter that belief with certainty. I do think that there's a good likelihood that she was joking, but I've not tried to persuade anyone that she was, only that it's unreasonable to claim that she absolutely wasn't.