Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (335738)	4/28/2007 5:22:38 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1573848

yep, it must sukk to be a liberal

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (335738)	4/28/2007 5:55:15 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573848

re: Call them on it, and they'll come up with their own "strawmen," such as "Do you think we have to agree with someone 100% of the time?" That's not a "strawman". What are you, an idiot?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (335738)	4/28/2007 6:01:38 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573848

"Do you think we have to agree with someone 100% of the time?" So, you agree with Bush 100% of the time? You must, otherwise, you'd be "nuancing"..

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (335738)	4/29/2007 12:34:44 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573848

Longnshort, > Ted won't answer that. Neither will any of the other "nuanced" folk. What in God's name did either of you think was so tricky about the question? It cracks me up.....you guys work so hard to make a mt. out of what I consider to be a molehill. It's all about finding anything that supports their view and ignoring that which doesn't, even if it's from the same source. Call them on it, and they'll come up with their own "strawmen," such as "Do you think we have to agree with someone 100% of the time?" Your attitude lost your people the Congress. It will lose you the presidency.