SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (81284)4/29/2007 2:49:29 AM
From: Perspective  Respond to of 110194
 
The trouble I have with solar is that the companies are very expensive relative to earnings - which is OK if you are a Google or and Apple with an established name that's worth a bunch. But in a fledgling commodity industry like solar, name just isn't that important. TSL has a $1.3B market cap, but it looks like their book value is around $13M:

finance.yahoo.com

so if there's so little capital investment here, and the field is so undifferentiated, why not dump $13M of my own money into the fray, build a competing company for 1% of the cost of buying TSL. Hell, I'd be willing to sell it for half the $1.3B market cap of TSL!

BC



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (81284)4/29/2007 6:31:18 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 110194
 
platinum - coating on most hard drives, catalytic agent in enough gasoline, most diesel powered cars, and used in fuel cells

silver - conductor in new generation power plants, kills germs in new era refrigerators and sox

gold - emperor of all cash, which in turn are soon to be king to all assets



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (81284)4/29/2007 5:54:30 PM
From: Tommaso  Respond to of 110194
 
>>> I like the solar energy companies which are performing better than uranium anyway<<<

There's not much point in asking you to provide proof for that statement, since there is no proof to be provided.