Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (204593)	4/29/2007 10:54:16 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793970

if you make an argument, expect to be addressed by those who find it worthy on non-worthy on the merits..... You didn't engage me or my point, either. You chattered with other people about aspects of the issue. Did you think that you were addressing me? If so, did you wonder why I didn't respond? As for your arguments that she was serious, they duplicate points made by others, points I already addressed. I don't see the point of dredging all that up again. except to those like yourself who are unwilling to accept that a proponent of your belief could be so incredibly stupid.... She is not a proponent of my belief nor I hers, to the best of my knowledge. I do not favor the global warming meme or its proponents. Why would I have had to go off and get the opinion via email of some of their proponents if I were one of them and could speak authoritatively for them.? I guess you assume that no one could see or would even try to see that discussion from her perspective unless he was one of them. I suppose that's the corollary to belief that since all Hollywood types are idiots, she must be an idiot and everything she says must be idiotic. I call that prejudice, not analysis.