SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (97160)5/1/2007 5:55:38 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Pollack didn't work for the Bush administration:

Senior Fellow Kenneth Pollack argues that to prevent Saddam from acquiring nuclear weapons, the United States has little choice to topple the regime, eradicate its weapons of mass destruction, and rebuild the country as a prosperous and stable society.

Pollack lays out five options available to the United States: bolstering containment, depending on a formal deterrence policy, mounting a covert action campaign, relying on airpower and the Iraqi opposition, and launching a full-scale invasion. Arguing the first four are no longer realistic, he concludes that only a full-scale invasion involving several hundred thousand American soldiers—what he terms the “least bad” option—can deal with the growing threat.


cfr.org

From:

The Threatening Storm
Author: Kenneth M. Pollack, Director of Research, Saban Center for Middle East Policy
A CFR Book. Random House

September 2002

Kenneth M. Pollack is Olin senior fellow and director for national security studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. From 1995-96 and 1999-2001, he served as director for Gulf affairs at the National Security Council, where he was the principal working-level official responsible for implementation of the U.S. policy toward Iraq. He is also the author of Arabs at War: Military Effectiveness, 1948-1991.