Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (229269)	5/1/2007 1:44:12 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

I'm not so sure I don't mean it, michael. There are so many no-nothings with opinions, and frankly so many people who come here for what America can give them, and then try to change it to the dictatorship they had at home...that we are in grave danger of not being the America that was hard fought for, and patriots shed their blood to protect and preserve. In the four years of War, we have lost less than 3500 Soldiers. 3500 too many, I will grant you. BUT considerably LESS than the 57,000+ that were killed in VietNam, where the very same Democrats defunded our troops, so they came home, were spat upon, and then the killing began in Southeast Asia in earnest....Cambodia and Laos lost millions, killed by the North Vietnamese and their friends.... The Dems have hammered Bush for his entire term about the WMD. And yet, look at the Snopes.com site....enter: WMD quotes pre 9-11..... You will see the Dems who currently say there aren't any and weren't any, have a very short term memory.....their words are quoted from the ACTUAL place where they uttered them. And here's a current one.... Just as a "for instance...." LB printed this link, and note the bold from me... newsbusters.org So, on one hand "Bush lied" about WMDs, yet on the other Tenet acted on the best known info available at the time. Well, it seems to make perfect sense that if Tenet was acting on information that they were all sure was quite correct at the time, then Bush did not "lie" when using that very same information. Right? Tell it to ABC.