Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (229352)	5/1/2007 5:48:26 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Zell Miller is a crazy man. Sam Nunn would have been a good president but boring.

To: KLP who wrote (229352)	5/1/2007 5:57:26 PM
From: geode00	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Says Zell: Military shortages, Social Security crisis, and illegal immigration all linked to abortion Friday, March 9, 2007, 12:12 PM The Atlanta Journal-Constitution It hasn’t gotten widespread play yet, but former U.S. Sen. Zell Miller made a little news this week in Macon when he declared that abortion has contributed to the military’s manpower shortage, the Social Security crisis, and the flow of illegal immigrants into the United States. “How could this great land of plenty produce too few people in the last 30 years? Here is the brutal truth that no one dares to mention: We’re too few because too many of our babies have been killed,” Miller said.... ajc.com Who knew rightwingers were against abortion because they want all those kids in the military, paying taxes and guarding the Mexico border? Gee. So Roe v Wade is responsible for not having enough people signing up for the volunteer military? It takes some real thinking to come up with such an amazing argument for the government to take ownership over a woman's body.

To: KLP who wrote (229352)	5/2/2007 12:49:59 AM
From: c.hinton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"They are both patriots for this country".....i am am sure they believe that as you do....but it is still ONLY a personal opinion not share by all. ps re reading" all my posts".... are you also insisting i read your 40,563 posts.. I believe you will find that most on SI direct their replies to one specific post. What i object to is not your opinion ,but your use of emotionally charge terms and lables whose very definitions you tailor to suit your personal agenda.