Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: miraje who wrote (12127)	5/1/2007 6:58:04 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 36917

Tide... Message 23508264 + PGE is looking at doing a demo about 15 miles west of me. ================ She's studying this field. May be a problem there she didn't know about; thanks, Dad... Message 22676124 Canadian sequestration Message 23132385 Norway uses sequestration. technologyreview.com == CCS applied to a modern conventional power plant could reduce CO2 emissions to the atmosphere by approximately 80-90% compared to a plant without CCS. Capturing and compressing CO2 requires much energy and would increase the fuel needs of a plant with CCS by about 10-40%. These and other system costs are estimated to increase the cost of energy from a power plant with CCS by 30-60% depending on the specific circumstances. en.wikipedia.org Then ,there is ocean sequestration from plankton, usually after ocean iron fertilization.