Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (336195)	5/3/2007 12:32:54 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572106

Steve, > reminds me of them blowing a fuse when I say I'm against abortions and for birth control... Since you're not for handing out condoms in public schools, you are obviously against birth control, and therefore you are obviously for unwanted children, overpopulation, higher crime, etc. Damn, this lib s--t is easy! Tenchusatsu

To: steve harris who wrote (336195)	5/3/2007 2:02:43 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572106

>reminds me of them blowing a fuse when I say I'm against abortions and for birth control... OK, Harris, I'm calling you out. I'm sick out this "liberal logic" crap. You're putting words in people's mouths and it's really f---ing annoying, to say nothing of being anti-intellectual. Every time I see you throw out a statement like this one, I want you to tell me three "liberals" on this thread who've made such statements. If you don't, I'm going to bug you till you do. You may have to put me on ignore, but I'm sure if you do, someone else here will pick up the slack for me. Who here has said that someone can't be both against abortion and for birth control? I can understand the thought process --I don't agree with it, but it certainly doesn't make me blow a fuse. I think all, or nearly all of the "liberals" on this thread would agree. -Z