SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (336269)5/3/2007 5:28:29 PM
From: SilentZ  Respond to of 1572510
 
>I repeat, Ted. The Dean campaign started imploding long before "Yeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrgh!"

Yeah, he managed to piss off the Democratic establishment a couple of weeks before Iowa because he ran to Terry McAuliffe (at the time the head of the DNC) whining that the other candidates were attacking him. It showed people that he didn't know how to handle being a front runner, and made it so that no one defended him when the media began picking on him for his moment of wild enthusiasm (not anger) in Iowa.

His own fault, but he's much better as the new head of the DNC anyway. He's much more of a motivator/mobilizer than a serious diplomat.

-Z



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (336269)5/4/2007 3:36:04 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1572510
 
Ted, > And that's why you think Dean lost his temper in Iowa....because, Ten, that is why his campaign fell apart. People freaked out when they so him angry.

I repeat, Ted. The Dean campaign started imploding long before "Yeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrgh!"


Okay. So what evidence do you have that the so far fictional "Clinton attack machine" was responsible for the implosion? If it was from some rightie, they are rarely correct esp when it comes ot the Dems.