Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (21241)	5/4/2007 7:44:04 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

Hi Frank, >>Is anyone holding out the proposition that states that both WiMAX or WiFi can coexist in a flourishing manner within the same narrow bands that we've been discussing here?<< IEEE 802.19 held their third telecon yesterday about coexistence between 802.11y and 802.16h. ieee802.org The NextWave simulation model is here dot16.org The Alvarion simulation results are here ieee802.org ieee802.org The CRC simulation results are here ieee802.org I'll note that 802.16h cannot coexist with WiMAX, much less with Wi-Fi or 802.11n petere

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (21241)	5/4/2007 7:47:41 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine	Respond to of 46821

Hi Frank, >>I keep experiencing flashbacks of an earlier era when I was a Ham operator on the 80 meter and 40 meter bands -- 3.x MHz and 7.x MHz, respectively. On 40 meters, especially, I recall vividly "tuning in" to 7.1 MHz only to find that thousands of other Hams sending Morse code simultaneously, one atop the other atop the other atop the other, causing an audio effect that could only be described as the cacophony of multiple train wrecks taking place all at once.<< I was a ham in the late '50s, and desperately wanted stereo headphones with a 3 kHz tuning offset between the earphones. But all the radio tuners were monaural. petere