SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: c.hinton who wrote (229867)5/5/2007 7:29:09 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Some dont get discarded

More of Nietzache needs to get discarded IMO, although he is an example of one who tried to incorporate more of biology into his philosophy.

Science tends not to be wrong, rather just not accurate enough. Newton's theory of gravity was not wrong, it just is not as accurate as General Relativity, which will at some point be superceded by something a bit more accurate that ties up more loose ends. But philosophies tend to be based on fundamental premises which turn out to be nonsense. Of course, that may well change in the future, when mental processes start being well defined by science, rather than philosophy. From then on, it will be a matter of accuracy, not tossing the old out each time something new is discovered. But with mental processes, morality, ethics, etc, we just are not to that point yet. Hence, mostly nonsense, pleasing though the nonsense be at times...