To: Paul Senior who wrote (84152 ) 5/6/2007 5:06:31 PM From: Wyätt Gwyön Respond to of 206327 you are right that the ability to do trades without tax consequences is a big plus for IRAs, and it doesn't hurt that you don't have to keep track of all the trades for tax reporting. also, in my case, thanks to the tax-free compounding of gains (and the fact that i wasn't drawing them down for living expenses during their "explosive growth" phase), my IRAs now dwarf my taxable accts--they are almost 75% of my total PF. so from a practical standpoint, if i want to make personally large trades i need to be using IRA money. i prefer to not trade my taxable acct at all, or only minimally. i have long-term holdings in there which pay sizeable dividends that pay my bills, and a lot of unrealized LTCG that i am perfectly willing to let continue being unrealized for a long, long time. thing though is that you want to do lots of this options stuff in an IRA or tax-deferred account i don't really want to do "options stuff" period. i used to do that a lot and it was very helpful in growing the PF back in 99 when we had a bubble and i had a lot of luck. back then options were very useful because i was gambling. nowadays i don't use leverage and i see options as just an easy way to lose money quickly (a lesson i forget from time to time and then remember after i lose some more money :). the one "advantage" options have is that they settle next day, instead of in three days as is the case with equities. so in an IRA, one can have quicker (albeit not immediate) access to settled cash from option sales, compared to equities. NB. "back in the day" (99 and 2000), the borkers did not have all these settled-funds rules and one could just churn and churn.