SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (79350)5/7/2007 6:07:34 PM
From: tonto  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 93284
 
Nice spin, but you clearly stated that if employment taxes were lowered, you could afford to provide health benefits...which of course is a terrible excuse for not providing health insurance to your only employee. Shameful...

Your employee would be much better off receiving health benefits which are tax free than a "higher" wage as you obviously lied about...you are not making any sense.

You are a cheap hypocrite.

To: David Lawrence who wrote (309807) 10/19/2002 3:36:40 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps Read Replies (1) of 761923

So you don't favor a cut in payroll taxes. Such a cut would allow me to pay MY Secretary some health care benefits. I don't need such a plan because the taxpayers already pay for mine through MY WIFE's federal employment.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (79350)5/7/2007 7:24:12 PM
From: tonto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
Kenneth, you first lied about your health care benefits...at the cost of taxpayers, and now you lie about your secretary's hours and that you would pay her more, although complain about payroll taxes instead of providing tax free health benefits. It is clear you lied and were very selfish. Shame on you.

Kenneth, you are a cheap phony and everyone knows it. On one hand you bragged about how well off you are, and on the other you state that you (a successful attorney as you claim) could not afford to provide health insurance for your full time employed attorney. You know that you are not believed...

It may be best for you to stop posting for awhile and that you get your stories straight...

It has been a very bad week for you. You and AS are pathetic liars.

To: tonto who wrote (617455) 9/3/2004 1:23:58 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps Read Replies (2) of 761990

No, I have a FULL TIME SECRETARY with an office, reception area, conference-library, and two offices, Telephone, FAX etc.

o: BlackDog777 who wrote (612368) 8/27/2004 11:30:40 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps Read Replies (1) of 761990

No, I'm on Social Security Retirement. I also have an active law practice, my own office and a full time SECRETARY. My grandparents only paid into the system for about 10 years.

It's my Secretary's choice (decision) to forego health care benefits for a higher wage and shorter work week.