Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cyprian who wrote (15052)	5/7/2007 10:16:23 PM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 22250

Cyprian > How come Alex Jones never does anything to expose Zionism? All he does is go on and on about the New World Order, the Luciferians, etc. Yes, that's true and I agree it often becomes tiresome. However, I have considered that he also wants to live and had he directly accused Israel/Mossad of involvement in the various crimes it's likely he could have had an "accident" or "committed suicide". Similar charges have been levelled against Noam Chomsky who has also been accused of being an Israel "apologist" because he doesn't come out directly and say that Mossad was behind 9/11. > How come Alex Jones gets TV time? Why would the Zionists put him on TV if he was doing something constructive to oppose them? Exactly. Because he doesn't indict them he gets TV time -- and he lives. You may be interested in what Alex Jones has to say on the subject of his Zionist connections. youtube.com > Most of the people in the 9/11 Truth movement are there to steer people away from the true criminals who perpetrated 9/11. I agree although I don't know how many. That is why one has to apply one's own filters to the information one obtains and come to one's own conclusions. Thus there can be no truly objective information, especially on such sensitive and controversial subjects, and anyone who is looking for it is deceiving himself that it exists. > Then you got that BYU professor Stephen Jones. He's likely a mason. All high-level Mormons are Freemasons. So what?! For what it's worth, I think his thermate story is bunkum -- but -- he has opened many peoples' eyes to the truth that 9/11 was an inside job and he has paid the price by losing his own job at BYU. > Alex Jones is used to steer people in the wrong direction. The fact that he promotes and associtates with the clown Charlie Sheen speaks volumes. That doesn't bug me either. I will listen to anyone who has the courage to stand up and speak truth to power, as Charlie Sheen did. > Rosie O'Donnell. Another useless spokesperson for truth. I didn't hear or see what she did but she certainly incurred a great deal of displeasure -- so she must have said something which was true. I have to say that it really bugs me that people who claim to be seekers of the truth about 9/11 and various other crimes criticize those who advance the cause, if only a small way, because they don't say everything the critics want to hear. Indeed, many of these critics act as if they are self-appointed authorities on the subject. In this regard, I can tell you that I couldn't stand Don Earl's attitude at his 9/11 thread because he reserved his harshest criticism for those, like myself, who he disagreed with over some relatively minor points eg the "pods" on the plane that struck WTC2 or the absence of debris from an airliner at the Pentagon. That I proved my bona fides and bust my guts on a daily basis at his thread arguing with whoever that 9/11 was an inside job was of no concern to him. He was more concerned, as many people seem to be, about trivia.