Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_urchin who wrote (15069)	5/8/2007 11:37:04 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22250

Anyway, however many people were involved no one has spoken out, that's true, but, for me, it doesn't prove anything one way or another. Sure it doesn't prove anything, but decreases likelihood. Whattaya think, 300 people worlwide involved in the conspiracy? Is that too many? If it is ~300, the likelihood that none would speak out is sorta ....... slim. It doesn't prove nothing, but it affects likelihood. If, however, you feel the silence of those involved is a reason to accept the official story then so be it. Nope, its not a reason to accept the official story, but it is a reason to doubt a conspiracy. That's like saying throw away the evidence, such as it is, because most of the evidence was in fact cleared off the crime scenes ASAP and disposed of. Perhaps you should think about that. Physical evidence - that's another topic. It's easier to do one at a time. Lets talk people/planners/plotters/bombers. What's your guess on how many people worldwide were involved in the destruction of the Twin Towers? Do you have an estimate?