Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (334999)	5/9/2007 9:17:18 PM
From: ScatterShot	Respond to of 436258

Amen. First class rant.

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (334999)	5/9/2007 9:48:38 PM
From: Terry Maloney	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

I just recommended that post, dude ... On purpose for once. <g>

To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (334999)	5/9/2007 10:28:32 PM
From: Cactus Jack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

we had rules once. if they are not re established for all to see, then, game over. done In a perverse way, I don't think the rules have particularly changed. I instead think the true rules weren't published or broadcast for most to understand. While I don't tend to buy into conspiracy theories (at least to my knowledge I don't), reading stuff like "The Creature from Jekyll Island" and "Empire of Debt" has changed my view of what governments and those in power are all about in most respects. That said, I think most in power would welcome a pardon of virtually anyone in power convicted of a crime. It's disturbing to me to be so cynical, but it's making more and more sense to me to think like a "kook". <NG> jpg